Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the public-law appeal met the constitutional reasoning requirements of Art. 90(1)(b) OJ
Extrahierter Entscheid
No. The appellants did not specifically attack the main reasoning of the cantonal court and thus failed to state clearly and precisely which constitutional rights were violated.
Extrahierte Begründung
In public-law appeal proceedings, the Federal Court does not review the contested decision ex officio; the appellant must explain the alleged constitutional violation. Mere recitation of circumstances from the criminal investigation is insufficient.