Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the public law appeal was admissible despite sparse reasoning on the challenged no-bill and factual findings.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The appeal did not satisfy the statutory motivation requirements and was therefore inadmissible.
Extrahierte Begründung
The appellant mainly reargued the facts and only briefly addressed the application of Art. 32 CP, which was insufficient under the applicable federal procedural rules.