Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the appeal was admissible despite failure to file a complete copy of the challenged judgment and despite a deficient reasoning.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The appeal was inadmissible because the appellant did not cure the formal defect by submitting the complete challenged decision and did not provide a sufficient legal reasoning.
Extrahierte Begründung
Article 42 BGG requires prayers and reasoning, and the challenged decision must be attached. The court had already set a deadline with warning under Article 42(5) BGG. The incomplete submission prevented review, and the appeal also failed to show any violation of federal law within the meaning of Articles 42 and 95 BGG, so summary non-entry under Article 108 BGG was warranted.