Kernrechtsfrage
Admissibility of the subsidiary constitutional complaint against the Geneva decision
Extrahierter Entscheid
The complaint was inadmissible because the filing did not invoke or reason any constitutional rights, and the Court therefore could not review the merits.
Extrahierte Begründung
A subsidiary constitutional complaint may only be based on constitutional violations and must be specifically pleaded and reasoned. The memorandum contained only factual assertions about the underlying tenancy dispute, which had long since been struck from the roll.