Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the federal appeal was admissible despite inadequate reasoning and no constitutional complaint.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The appeal was manifestly inadmissible because the reasoning was incomprehensible and no violation of constitutional rights was invoked, although that was the only permissible ground.
Extrahierte Begründung
The appellant did not meet the requirement of proper reasoning under Art. 42(2) and 106(2) LTF. Since only constitutional grievances could be raised under Art. 98 LTF, the appeal failed to state any admissible ground and had to be dealt with in simplified procedure under Art. 108(1)(b) LTF.