Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible against the interlocutory procedural order ordering a main hearing instead of a written procedure.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The complaint was inadmissible because no irreparable legal disadvantage was shown and the challenged order was not separately appealable.
Extrahierte Begründung
The order was a procedural interlocutory decision under Art. 93 BGG. Aside from the exceptional case in Art. 93(1)(b) BGG, a complaint is admissible only if it can cause irreparable legal harm. The appellant did not explain any such harm from holding the main hearing.