Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the subsidiary constitutional complaint met the admissibility and reasoning requirements.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The complaint was manifestly inadmissible because it did not raise and substantiate any violation of constitutional rights and did not engage with the reasoning of the challenged judgment.
Extrahierte Begründung
In a subsidiary constitutional complaint only constitutional rights may be invoked, and only if specifically pleaded and reasoned. The appellants failed to do so.