Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the federal complaint met the reasoning requirements for admissibility
Extrahierter Entscheid
It did not, because the complaint did not address the cantonal court's inadmissibility reasoning under Art. 42(2) BGG.
Extrahierte Begründung
Since the appellant failed to engage with the decisive question of the admissibility of the cantonal remedy, the Federal Supreme Court could not review the alternative reasoning.