Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the federal criminal appeal met the mandatory reasoning requirements of Art. 42 LTF.
Extrahierter Entscheid
No. The appellant merely asserted his innocence and denied selling drugs, without formulating any legal criticism of the cantonal judgment.
Extrahierte Begründung
Under Art. 42(1)-(2) LTF, the appellant must briefly explain how the challenged decision violates the law. Bare denials and assertions of innocence are insufficient; failing this requirement leads to inadmissibility under Art. 108(1)(b) LTF.