Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the criminal appeal met the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning requirements.
Extrahierter Entscheid
No. The appellant merely expressed disagreement with the cantonal decision and did not explain why it violated federal law.
Extrahierte Begründung
Art. 42 paras. 1 and 2 LTF require the appellant to state briefly how the challenged decision infringes the law. Because the submission lacked any substantive reasoning, the appeal could not be examined.