Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the cantonal tribunal's refusal to enter into the revision request violated federal law or constitutional rights.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The appellant did not demonstrate a federal-law or constitutional violation. The complaint was manifestly unfounded insofar as admissible.
Extrahierte Begründung
The challenged submissions did not show a legally sufficient revision ground. The alleged refusal to hear a witness and the alleged omission to address a procedurally raised objection do not constitute revision grounds, even if they were linked to a hearing violation. The remaining criticism about lack of prior notice of the timing of evidentiary closure was not shown to be a revision ground under the applicable cantonal law.