Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the federal appeal met the reasoning requirements of Art. 42 LTF
Extrahierter Entscheid
No. The appeal did not sufficiently explain why the challenged judgment was unlawful or which decisive facts were manifestly inaccurate.
Extrahierte Begründung
The appellant only corrected an irrelevant fact and repeated arguments already addressed below. This does not satisfy the duty to state conclusions, reasons, evidence, and a concise explanation of the violation of law.