No maintenance advances after moving to France

ATA/181/1998Cour de justice / Verwaltungskammer31.03.1998Dismissed

Von Omnilex extrahiert

Omnilex-Zusammenfassung

The appellant challenged the refusal of maintenance advances under the Geneva scheme. The court held that entitlement under Art. 8 para. 1 LARPA requires domicile in Geneva. Since the appellant was no longer domiciled in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 SCC and had moved to France, she no longer satisfied the statutory condition. The appeal was dismissed and the refusal of advances stood.

Omnilex-Regeste

Art. 8 al. 1 LARPA; requirement of domicile in Geneva for entitlement to maintenance advances. The cantonal scheme ties the right to advances to domicile in Geneva, determined according to Art. 23 SCC. A person whose domicile has shifted to France no longer satisfies the territorial condition and loses entitlement; the authority must refuse or terminate advances once the domicile requirement ceases to be met.

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Descripteurs

OBLIGATION D'ENTRETIEN; AVANCE(EN GENERAL); IP

Normes

LARPA.8 al.1

Résumé

La recourante qui n'est plus domiciliée à Genève (au sens de l'art. 23 CCS) mais en France n'a plus droit aux avances du Scarpa.

Schlagwörter

maintenance advancesdomicileterritorial competencefamily supportsocial benefits

Von Omnilex extrahiert

Von Omnilex extrahierte Kernrechtsfragen

Kernrechtsfrage

Whether a person who is no longer domiciled in Geneva remains entitled to Scarpa maintenance advances under Art. 8 para. 1 LARPA.

Extrahierter Entscheid

No. Once the appellant was no longer domiciled in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 SCC and was domiciled in France, she no longer met the entitlement requirements.

Extrahierte Begründung

The court treated Geneva domicile as a condition for receiving the advances. Because the appellant had moved her domicile abroad, the statutory territorial condition was no longer fulfilled.

No maintenance advances after moving to FranceKI-generiert