LAMO coverage denied for lack of Geneva domicile

ATA/209/1998Cour de justice / Verwaltungskammer21.04.1998Inadmissible

Von Omnilex extrahiert

Omnilex-Zusammenfassung

The Administrative Court held that the insured person no longer had domicile in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 CC. As a result, she could not qualify for coverage under LAMO. The court therefore declared her appeal inadmissible.

Omnilex-Regeste

Art. 23 CC; LAMO.22 al.5; domicile as a condition for LAMO coverage. Where the claimant no longer has domicile in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 CC, the statutory condition for coverage is not met. In such a case, the appeal seeking the benefit of LAMO is inadmissible, as the absence of domicile excludes entitlement ab initio (consid. n.a.).

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Descripteurs

ASSURANCE SOCIALE; ASSURANCE OBLIGATOIRE; COUVERTURE; DEBITEUR; AFFECTION OCULAIRE; SEJOUR A L'HOPITAL; RESILIATION; PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATIVE; CONDITION DE RECEVABILITE; DOMICILE; ASSU

Normes

LAMO.22 al.5

Résumé

Le TA a déclaré irrecevable le recours déposé par une assurée, au motif que celle-ci n'était plus considérée comme domiciliée à Genève au sens de l'art. 23 CC. Elle ne pouvait dès lors en aucun cas être mise au bénéfice de la LAMO.

Schlagwörter

social insurancehealth insurancedomicileadmissibilitycoverageadministrative procedure

Von Omnilex extrahiert

Kernrechtsfrage

Whether the appeal was admissible in light of the claimant’s domicile for LAMO purposes.

Extrahierter Entscheid

The claimant was not domiciled in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 CC and therefore could not be covered by LAMO; the appeal was inadmissible.

Extrahierte Begründung

LAMO coverage was conditional on Geneva domicile. Since the claimant no longer met that domicile requirement, the substantive legal basis for coverage was absent, making the appeal incapable of success.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.