Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the appeal was admissible in light of the claimant’s domicile for LAMO purposes.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The claimant was not domiciled in Geneva within the meaning of Art. 23 CC and therefore could not be covered by LAMO; the appeal was inadmissible.
Extrahierte Begründung
LAMO coverage was conditional on Geneva domicile. Since the claimant no longer met that domicile requirement, the substantive legal basis for coverage was absent, making the appeal incapable of success.