Whether the applicant’s reminder against refusal of legal advice assistance should succeed.
The reminder is admissible but unfounded; the refusal of legal advice assistance stands.
16 AR 6/06•Reminder against refusal of legal aid
16 AR 6/06Gericht erster Instanz24.05.2006ÜbrigeAbgewiesen
Von Omnilex extrahiert
The applicant filed a reminder on 31 January 2006 against the registrar’s 23 January 2006 refusal to grant requested legal advice assistance (case 5 UR II 183/05). The District Court of Aachen held that the reminder was admissible under § 6(2) BerHG but unfounded, and rejected it. The refusal therefore remained in effect.
§ 6(2) BerHG; the statutory reminder against refusal of legal advice assistance is admissible where the procedural requirements are met. On the merits, the reminder must be rejected if the refusal is not shown to be incorrect. No further general legal principle or reasoning is stated in the decision text provided.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2006-05-24
Aktenzeichen: 16 AR 6/06
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGAC1:2006:0524.16AR6.06.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: Einzelrichter
In der Beratungshilfesache
wird die gemäß § 6 Abs. 2 BerHG zulässige Erinnerung des Antragstellers vom 31. 1. 2006 gegen den die Bewilligung der beantragten Beratungshilfe verweigernden Be-schluss der Rechtspflegerin vom 23. 1. 2006 – 5 UR II 183/05 –als nicht begründet verworfen.
Whether the applicant’s reminder against refusal of legal advice assistance should succeed.
The reminder is admissible but unfounded; the refusal of legal advice assistance stands.
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.