18 C 14/96•Package-travel defects: flight change, turbulence, and construction site
18 C 14/96Gericht erster Instanz27.06.1996ZivilrechtAbgewiesen
Von Omnilex extrahiert
The plaintiff's package-travel claim was based on the outbound flight being advanced by five hours, turbulence during the flight, and the view of a construction site about 300 metres away. The Local Court of Bonn dismissed the claim. It held that the five-hour flight change was not a defect, that turbulence did not establish a defect absent physical impairment, and that merely seeing a construction site at that distance was not a defect in a package-tour area. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs. The judgment was declared provisionally enforceable, subject to the stated security conditions.
BGB §§ 651a, 651c and 651d; package-travel defect. Advancing the outbound flight by five hours does not, by itself, constitute a defect in a package flight trip. Turbulence during air transport is not a travel defect where it causes no physical impairment to the travellers. Nor does the mere sight of a construction site approximately 300 metres away constitute a defect, at least in package-tour areas. The assessment turns on whether the circumstances amount to a shortcoming in the travel services provided; the stated circumstances do not suffice.
Entscheidungsdatum: 1996-06-27
Aktenzeichen: 18 C 14/96
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:1996:0627.18C14.96.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: 18. Zivilabteilung
Normen: BGB §§ 651a, 651c, 651d
Die Vorverlegung des Hinflugs im Rahmen einer Pauschalflugreise um fünf Stunden begründet keinen Mangel. Turbulenzen während der Flugbeförderung begründen jedenfalls dann keinen Mangel, wenn sie nicht zu physischen Beeinträchtigungen der Reisenden führen. Der bloße Anblick einer ca. 300m entfernten Baustelle ist jedenfalls in Pauschalreisegebieten nicht als Mangel zu werten.
Die Klage wird abgewiesen.
Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits trägt der Kläger.
Das Urteil ist vorläufig vollstreckbar.
Es bleibt dem Kläger nachgelassen, die Vollstreckung wegen der Kosten durch die Beklagte gegen Sicherheitsleistung in Höhe von 120 % des zu vollstreckenden Betrages abzuwenden, sofern nicht die Beklagte vor der Vollstreckung in gleicher Höhe Sicherheit leistet.
Whether advancing the outbound flight by five hours constituted a travel defect.
The five-hour advancement of the outbound flight did not constitute a defect.
The court held that this change to the flight time did not amount to a defect in the package trip.
Whether turbulence during the flight constituted a travel defect.
Turbulence did not constitute a defect where it caused no physical impairment to the travellers.
The turbulence was not shown to have caused physical impairment.
Whether the view of a construction site approximately 300 metres away constituted a travel defect.
The view of the construction site did not constitute a defect in a package-tour area.
The mere sight of a construction site at that distance was not treated as a defect in the circumstances of a package-tour area.
The plaintiff's claim arising from the alleged package-travel defects.
The claim was dismissed.
The alleged circumstances did not establish a travel defect.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.