Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
BAG 3 AZR 220/09•Revision dismissed; defendant bears costs
BAG 3 AZR 220/09Bag / 3. Abteilung16.02.2010Dismissed
Von Omnilex extrahiert
The Federal Labour Court (3rd Senate) dismissed the defendant's revision against the Cologne Regional Labour Court judgment and ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the revision proceedings. The decision contains no factual or legal reasoning because the parties waived the statement of facts and the reasons.
Revision in employment matters; dismissal of the revision and cost allocation. Where the parties waive the statement of facts and the reasons, the judgment may be confined to the operative part; the unsuccessful revising party bears the costs of the revision proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-02-16
Aktenzeichen: 3 AZR 220/09
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Köln, 18. Januar 2008, Az: 2 Ca 10800/06, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Köln, 12. Februar 2009, Az: 13 Sa 613/08, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 3. Senat
Die Revision des Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Köln vom 12. Februar 2009 - 13 Sa 613/08 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Beklagte hat die Kosten des Revisionsverfahrens zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet.
| Reinecke | Zwanziger | Schlewing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmidt | G. Kanzleiter |
Von Omnilex extrahiert
Whether the defendant's revision against the Cologne LAG judgment was well-founded.
The revision was unfounded and was rejected.
No reasons were recorded because the parties waived the statement of facts and grounds; the dispositive part therefore only states dismissal of the revision.
Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings?
The defendant must bear the costs of the revision proceedings.
The court allocated costs against the unsuccessful revising party.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.