Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
BAG 6 AZR 119/10•Revision partly successful; appeal dismissed as inadmissible
BAG 6 AZR 119/10Bag / 6. Abteilung19.10.2010Partially Granted
Von Omnilex extrahiert
The Federal Labour Court decided a revision in an employment wage dispute. The plaintiff had sought a declaration that the defendant state was obliged to pay base salary under pay group IIa BAT at the highest age step for the period from 1 June 2008 to 31 October 2008. The Court partly set aside the Hessian Labour Court's judgment and held the plaintiff's appeal inadmissible insofar as it concerned that declaratory claim. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal and revision. The decision was issued without factual findings and reasons because the parties waived them in light of the parallel lead case.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a lead parallel case, the Federal Labour Court may dispose of the revision accordingly. An appeal is inadmissible insofar as it is directed against a declaratory ruling on a precisely delimited wage entitlement period when the procedural prerequisites for appellate review are lacking. The Court may therefore partly set aside the appellate judgment and reject the appeal as inadmissible; costs follow the outcome of the revision proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-10-19
Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 119/10
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Marburg, 17. April 2009, Az: 2 Ca 102/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 6. Januar 2010, Az: 2 Sa 1126/09, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 6. Senat
Auf die Revision des beklagten Landes wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 6. Januar 2010 - 2 Sa 1126/09 - teilweise aufgehoben.
Die Berufung des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Marburg vom 17. April 2009 - 2 Ca 102/09 - wird im Umfang der Feststellung, dass das beklagte Land verpflichtet ist, dem Kläger Grundvergütung nach der Vergütungsgruppe II a der Anlage 1a zum BAT nach der höchsten Lebensaltersstufe dieser Vergütungsgruppe für die Zeit vom 1. Juni 2008 bis zum 31. Oktober 2008 zu zahlen, als unzulässig verworfen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 6 AZR 118/10 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Fischermeier | Brühler | Spelge | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beus | Uwe Zabel |
Von Omnilex extrahiert
Whether the plaintiff's appeal against the first-instance judgment was admissible insofar as it sought a declaratory finding on wage entitlement for 1 June 2008 to 31 October 2008.
The appeal was inadmissible to that extent.
The Federal Labour Court partly set aside the appellate judgment and rejected the appeal as inadmissible for the specifically defined declaratory claim period.
Whether the appellate judgment had to be partially set aside on revision by the defendant state.
Yes; the appellate judgment was partially set aside.
Because the appeal was inadmissible in the relevant part, the revision succeeded to that extent.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.