Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
BAG 4 AZR 222/13•Revision dismissed; claimant bears appellate costs
BAG 4 AZR 222/13Bag / 4. Abteilung18.06.2014Dismissed
Von Omnilex extrahiert
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the judgment of the Hessian LAG. The case was decided without a written statement of facts or reasons because, in view of a parallel proceeding, the parties waived them. The only dispositive consequence stated is that the claimant must bear the costs of the revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in revision proceedings: Where the parties waive a written statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labour Court may dispose of the case accordingly. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is to be dismissed and the revising party bears the costs of the revision; the absence of a reasoned recital does not affect the dispositive judgment when the statutory prerequisites for dispensing with reasons are met.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18
Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 222/13
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 206/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 386/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 4. Senat
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 386/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Creutzfeldt | Treber | Spinner | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schuldt | Kriegelsteiner |
Von Omnilex extrahiert
Whether the claimant's revision against the LAG judgment should succeed
The revision was unfounded and had to be dismissed.
The Federal Labour Court rejected the revision in full; no separate statement of facts or reasons was given because the parties waived them in view of a parallel proceeding.
Who must bear the costs of the revision
The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.
As the unsuccessful revising party, the claimant bears the costs of the appellate proceedings.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.