Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
BVerfG 2 BvR 1511/11•Scope of restitution exclusion for reform and reparations measures
BVerfG 2 BvR 1511/11Bverfg / 2. Senat 2. Kammer19.11.2013Inadmissible
Von Omnilex extrahiert
The Federal Constitutional Court, 2nd Chamber of the 2nd Senate, issued a non-reasoned chamber order on a constitutional complaint challenging Dresden court decisions on restitution exclusion for Boden- und Industriereform and reparations measures. The complaint was not accepted for decision. No substantive constitutional review was provided in the order.
§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; non-admission of a constitutional complaint by chamber order without reasons. A chamber may decline to accept a constitutional complaint for decision without setting out reasons. Such a non-admission order contains no substantive constitutional determination and leaves the challenged lower-court decisions untouched.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-11-19
Aktenzeichen: 2 BvR 1511/11
Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung
Normen: Art 143 Abs 3 GG, § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, Nr 1 RegGErkl/EinigVtr, § 1 Abs 5 StrRehaG
Vorinstanz: vorgehend OLG Dresden, 8. Juni 2011, Az: 1 Reha Ws 98/09, Beschlussvorgehend OLG Dresden, 26. November 2010, Az: 1 Reha Ws 98/09, Beschlussvorgehend LG Dresden, 24. August 2009, Az: BSRH 22/06, Beschlussnachgehend Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, 9. Juni 2016, Az: 44164/14, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat 2. Kammer
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Reichweite des Restitutionsausschlusses für Maßnahmen der Boden- und Industriereform sowie für Reparationsmaßnahmen zwischen 1945 und 1949
Von Omnilex extrahiert
Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible and should be admitted for decision.
The complaint was not accepted for decision.
The chamber issued a summary non-admission order without reasons; the available record indicates no further examination on the merits.
Whether the challenged decisions concerning restitution exclusion under the reunification and rehabilitation rules violated constitutional rights.
No merits decision was rendered in this chamber order.
Because the complaint was not accepted, the court did not issue a substantive constitutional assessment.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.