Kernrechtsfrage
Whether revision should be admitted for the question whether an assessment system without regular evaluations satisfies Art. 33(2) GG.
Extrahierter Entscheid
Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance.
Extrahierte Begründung
The proceedings can clarify whether and under what conditions an evaluation system for life-tenured judges that dispenses with regular assessments and relies only on occasion-based assessments with limited periods meets the constitutional requirements of merit-based selection under Art. 33(2) GG.