Kernrechtsfrage
Whether revision should be admitted for fundamental importance because the legal significance of workplace integration management under Section 84(2) sentence 1 SGB IX for retirement of a civil servant under former Article 56(1) sentence 2 BayBG is unresolved.
Extrahierter Entscheid
Revision was admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental significance requiring clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.
Extrahierte Begründung
The court considered the complaint admissible and well-founded. The unresolved relationship between the statutory workplace integration management and retirement for disability could affect the legality of placing a civil servant into retirement, justifying review under Section 132(2) No. 1 VwGO.