Trustees of the California State University (PERB 1788H)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DECISION OF THE
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD
ACADEMIC PROFESSIONALS OF
CALIFORNIA,
Charging Party,
v.
TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE
UNIVERSITY,
Respondent.
Case No.LA-CE-616-H
PERB Decision No. 	1788-H
December 	9, 	2005
Appearances: Rothner, Segall & Greenstone by Bernhard Rohrbacher, Attorney, for Academic
Professionals of California; Janette Redd Williams, University Counsel, for Trustees of the
California State University.
Before Duncan, Chairman; McKeag and Neuwald, Members.
DECISION
NEUWALD: This case is before the Public Employment Relations Board (Board) on
exceptions filed by both the Academic Professionals of California and Trustees of the
California State University (CSU) to an administrative law judge's proposed decision. 	The
unfair practice charge and complaint alleged that CSU violated the Higher Education
Employer-Employee Relations Act (HEERA)1 by unilaterally implementing various computer
use policies at several campuses as well as a telephone policy at the San Luis Obispo campus.
By letter dated November 8, 2005, both parties petitioned the Board to withdraw
without prejudice their exceptions to the proposed decision because the parties have developed
a mutually satisfactory resolution of the issues.
HEERA is codified at Government Code section 3560, et seq.

2
Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Board finds the withdrawal to be in the
best interests of the parties and to be consistent with the purposes of HEERA. Accordingly,
the Board grants the withdrawal.
ORDER
The request by the Academic Professionals of California and the Trustees of the
California State University to withdraw the unfair practice charge in Case No. LA-CE-616-H is
hereby GRANTED. 	The appeal is, therefore, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Chairman Duncan and Member McKeag joined in this Decision.
N