PERB Order No. A338MA•Marin County Law Library (PERB A338MA)
Gesamter Gesetzestext
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DECISION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD ELIZABETH GEISMAR, Charging Party, v. MARIN COUNTY LAW LIBRARY, Respondent. Case No. SF-CE-159-M Request for Reconsideration PERB Order No. Ad-338-M PERB Order No. Ad-338a-M A u g u s t 3 0 , 2004 Appearances: James Baker, Labor-Relations Specialist, for Elizabeth Geismar; Murchison & Cumming, by Michael B. Lawler and Pam J. Marantz, Attorneys, for Marin County Law Library. Before Duncan, Chairman; Whitehead and Neima, Members. DECISION DUNCAN, Chairman: This case is before the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB or Board) on Elizabeth Geismar's (Geismar) request for reconsideration of Marin County Law Library (Geismar) (2004) PERB Order No. Ad-338-M (Marin). In Marin, the issue was related to an untimely amendment to the unfair practice charge. Geismar filed a request for reconsideration in this case and in Marin County Law Library (Geismar) (2004) PERB Decision No. 1655-M. There was no differentiation in the request for reconsideration filed in the two cases. Geismar did not set forth any grounds for reconsideration in either case. Because she has not set forth grounds for reconsideration as stated in PERB Regulation 32410,1 the request for reconsideration is denied. PERB regulations are codified at California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 31001, et seq.
ORDER Elizabeth Geismar's request for reconsideration of the Board's decision in Marin County Law Library (Geismar) (2004) PERB Order No. Ad-338-M is hereby DENIED. Members Whitehead and Neima have joined in this Decision. 22
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.