Episcopal Church Cases

G036498Court of Appeal Fourth Appellate District / 3. Abteilung25.06.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Filed 6/25/07 Episcopal Church Cases CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
EPISCOPAL CHURCH CASES. G036498
(JCCP No. 4392)
O P I N I O N
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, David C.
Velasquez, Judge. Reversed.
Holme Roberts & Owen and John R. Shiner for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Payne & Fears, Eric C. Sohlgren, Benjamin A. Nix and Daniel F. Lula for
Defendants and Respondents.
* * *

-- 1 of 2 --

2
In a related case involving the same parties, the trial court granted the
defendants’ anti-SLAPP suit motion and dismissed the plaintiffs’ lawsuit. A request for
attorney fees by defendants followed, and about $100,000 in total fees and costs were
awarded.
The plaintiffs have appealed. As we explain (at great length) in the
published opinion from the appeal of the judgment of dismissal, the plaintiffs have a
meritorious case and the anti-SLAPP suit motion should never have been granted. (See
generally Episcopal Church Cases (June __, 2007, G036096, G036408, G036868) ___
Cal.App.4th ___. Accordingly, the order premised on the loss of the anti-SLAPP suit
motion must be reversed. Appellants are to recover their costs on appeal.
SILLS, P. J.
WE CONCUR:
MOORE, J.
FYBEL, J.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.