USA v. Michael Singletary

09-10680Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit18.03.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAR 18, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-10680
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-80073-CR-DTKH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL SINGLETARY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(March 18, 2010)
Before BARKETT, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael B. Cohen, counsel for Michael Singletary in this direct criminal

-- 1 of 2 --

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Singletary’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.