Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-11013•Calvin Lamar Middleton v. Tony Patterson
09-11013Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit19.08.2010
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 19, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-11013
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00330-CV-WS-C
CALVIN LAMAR MIDDLETON,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
TONY PATTERSON,
Respondent-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(August 19, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
-- 1 of 2 --
In finding that Calvin Lamar Middleton’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus
petition is time-barred, and that he is not entitled to equitable tolling of the
applicable deadline, the district court reasoned that even if Middleton did not learn
that his direct appeal was denied until December 2000, he still had until January 7,
2001 to file his petition. The district court, however, failed to address Middleton’s
assertion that he did not receive his case file from his attorney until January 2001.
In light of that omission, as well as the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Holland
v. Florida, 560 U.S. __, 130 S.Ct. 2549 (2010), we vacate the judgment of the
district court and remand for further consideration. We do so without implying
any view on how the tolling issue should be decided on remand.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.