USA v. Oscar Lynden Knowles

09-12890Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit07.01.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
January 7, 2010
JOHN LEY
ACTING CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-12890
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-14033-CR-DLG
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OSCAR LYNDEN KNOWLES,
d.b.a. Lindy,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(January 7, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Pinoli, appointed counsel for Oscar Lynden Knowles, has filed a

-- 1 of 2 --

motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493
(1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s denial of Knowles’s motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.