USA v. Eneyda Romero Molina

09-14827Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit20.05.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 20, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-14827
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00457-CR-1-CAP
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ENEYDA ROMERO MOLINA,
a.k.a. Martha Salgado-Vega,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
_________________________
(May 20, 1020)
Before MARCUS, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
David Marshall, appointed counsel for Eneyda Romero Molina in this direct

-- 1 of 2 --

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Molina’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.