USA v. Travis M. Huntley

09-15093Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit10.09.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 10, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-15093
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 09-00007-CR-4-RH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TRAVIS M. HUNTLEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(September 10, 2010)
Before BARKETT, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard A. Greenberg, appointed counsel for Travis M. Huntley in this

-- 1 of 2 --

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Huntley’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.