USA v. William Clayton Sapp

09-15183Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit06.08.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 6, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-15183
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 08-00207-CR-J-25MCR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM CLAYTON SAPP,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(August 6, 2010)
Before BARKETT, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Gerald S. Bettman, appointed counsel for William Clayton Sapp in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

-- 1 of 2 --

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sapp’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.