Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-10193•Edward P. Manturuck v. Richard M. Meeks
10-10193Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit14.09.2010
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 14, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 10-10193
Non-Argument Calendar
_____________
D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-00079-AAA-JEG
EDWARD P. MANTURUCK,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RICHARD M. MEEKS, Georgia State
Trooper,
Defendant-Appellee.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
__________________________
(September 14, 2010)
Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 2 --
PER CURIAM:
We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs. We conclude that the
district court correctly dismissed the complaint.
The statements of conclusions without fact averments do not and did not
meet the plausibility standard of Randall v. Scott, 610 F.3d 701 (11 Cir. 2010).th
Appellant did not and has not moved for permission to amend the
complaint. No amendment was filed or proffered.
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.