USA v. Elijah Nahum Simmons

12-12464Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit03.01.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-12464
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00001-BAE-GRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ELIJAH NAHUM SIMMONS,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(January 3, 2013)
Before MARCUS, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-12464 Date Filed: 01/03/2013 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

Christopher E. Chapman, appointed counsel for Elijah Nahum Simmons in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87
S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Simmons’s
convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Case: 12-12464 Date Filed: 01/03/2013 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.