Thomas E. Metcalfe v. Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15592
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-20345-FAM
THOMAS E. METCALFE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
POSTMASTER GENERAL, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE,
an independent agency of the United States of America,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(March 3, 2014)
Before ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and MOODY* and SCHLESINGER,**
District Judges.
____________
*Honorable James S. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida,
sitting by designation.
**Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of
Florida, sitting by designation.
Case: 12-15592 Date Filed: 03/03/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Although we are inclined to believe that it would have been better to have
granted the motion for extension of time, we cannot conclude that plaintiff has
demonstrated reversible error. The plaintiff had ample time to digest all of the late
discovery by the time of the motion to reconsider. However, neither that motion,
nor in the plaintiff’s brief on appeal, nor at oral argument has plaintiff pointed to
any indication of discrimination, or even any indication that further proceedings
might develop evidence of discrimination. Accordingly, the judgment of the
district court is
AFFIRMED.
Case: 12-15592 Date Filed: 03/03/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --