USA v. Maurice M. ONeal

13-12720Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit05.06.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12720
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00006-DHB-WLB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MAURICE M. ONEAL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(June 5, 2014)
Before MARCUS, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Matthew L. Waters, appointed counsel for Maurice Oneal in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 13-12720 Date Filed: 06/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Oneal’s sentence is
AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-12720 Date Filed: 06/05/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.