Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
15-15683•USA v. Stacie E. Leipold
15-15683Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit15.12.2016
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-15683
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:15-cr-00020-CDL-MSH-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STACIE E. LEIPOLD,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(December 15, 2016)
Before ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-15683 Date Filed: 12/15/2016 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Stacie E. Leipold in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Leipold’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
Case: 15-15683 Date Filed: 12/15/2016 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.