USA v. Miguel Rayo-Camacho

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10453
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00362-JDW-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MIGUEL RAYO-CAMACHO,
SPANISH INTERPRETER REQUIRED,
a.k.a. Miguel Rayo,
a.k.a. Alejandro Gonzalez-Valdez,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 28, 2016)
Case: 16-10453 Date Filed: 09/28/2016 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Aliza Hochman Bloom, appointed counsel for Miguel Rayo-Camacho in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rayo-Camacho’s
conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
Case: 16-10453 Date Filed: 09/28/2016 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --