USA v. Frederick Michael Pohl, Jr.

20-10005Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit11.09.2020

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________

No. 20-10005
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00045-JDW-PRL-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FREDERICK MICHAEL POHL, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.
________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 11, 2020)
Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Case: 20-10005 Date Filed: 09/11/2020 Page: 1 of 2

2

Lynn Bailey, appointed counsel for Frederick Michael Pohl, Jr., in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief
prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Pohl’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-10005 Date Filed: 09/11/2020 Page: 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.