USA v. Henry Francis

20-11264Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit17.11.2020

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________

No. 20-11264
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:93-cr-00158-JDW-TGW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HENRY FRANCIS,

Defendant-Appellant.
________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 17, 2020)
Before JORDAN, LUCK, and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 20-11264 Date Filed: 11/17/2020 Page: 1 of 2

2

Juliann Welch, appointed counsel for Henry Francis, has moved to withdraw
from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct given
the district court’s exercise of discretion in denying Francis’ motion under the First
Step Act. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the
district court’s denial of Francis’ motion to reduce sentence is AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 20-11264 Date Filed: 11/17/2020 Page: 2 of 2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.