USA v. Wilson Peter Revange

20-13249Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit17.12.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 20-13249
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILSON PETER REVANGE,
a.k.a. Jackboi,
a.k.a. Winson Revange,
Defendant-Appellant.
USCA11 Case: 20-13249 Date Filed: 12/17/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 20-13249
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00327-SCB-AEP-10
____________________
Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH and LUCK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
William Sansone, appointed counsel for Wilson Revange in
this appeal from the denial of Revange’s post-judgment motion for
a certified copy of his criminal-proceeding documents and subse-
quent motion for reconsideration, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination
of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Revange’s
post-judgment motions seeking documents are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-13249 Date Filed: 12/17/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.