USA v. Venkatesh Dagubatti

20-14751Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit16.11.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 20-14751
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VENKATESH DAGUBATTI,
Defendant-Appellant.
USCA11 Case: 20-14751 Date Filed: 11/16/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 20-14751
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00029-WMR-JSA-1
____________________
Before J ILL PRYOR , BRANCH, and L UCK , Circuit Judges.
Saraliene Smith Durrett, appointed counsel for Venkatesh
Dagubatti in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw
from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pur-
suant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independ-
ent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment
of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dagubat-
ti’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-14751 Date Filed: 11/16/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.