Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
21-13876•USA v. Lori Ann Crofoot
21-13876Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit16.05.2022
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-13876
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LORI ANN CROFOOT,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cr-00243-KKM-CPT-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-13876 Date Filed: 05/16/2022 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 21-13876
Before ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michelle R. Yard, appointed counsel for Lori Ann Crofoot
in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from fur-
ther representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent re-
view of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent ex-
amination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Crofoot’s con-
viction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-13876 Date Filed: 05/16/2022 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.