Gesamter Gesetzestext
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-14360
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL DUFFY,
a.k.a. Michael Duffey,
a.k.a. Xtra Mike,
Defendant-Appellant.
USCA11 Case: 21-14360 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
22-10470 Opinion of the Court 2
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00019-MTT-CHW-1
____________________
Before BRANCH, BRASHER, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
John Fox, appointed counsel for Michael Duffy in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and Duffy’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-14360 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
