Moms for Liberty - Brevard County, FL, et al v. Brevard Public Schools, et al

22-10297Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit21.11.2022

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-10297
____________________
MOMS FOR LIBERTY - BREVARD COUNTY, FL,
AMY KNEESSY,
ASHLEY HALL,
KATIE DELANEY,
JOSEPH CHOLEWA,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
BREVARD PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
MISTY HAGGARD-BELFORD,
Chair, Brevard County School Board, in her official and
individual capacities,
MATT SUSIN,
Vice Chair, Brevard County School Board, in his official and
individual capacities,
USCA11 Case: 22-10297 Date Filed: 11/21/2022 Page: 1 of 3

-- 1 of 3 --

2 Opinion of the Court 22-10297
CHERYL MCDOUGALL,
Member, Brevard County School Board, in her official and
individual capacities,
KATYE CAMPBELL,
Member, Brevard County School Board, in her official and
individual capacities, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 6:21-cv-01849-RBD-GJK
____________________
Before W ILSON, J ILL PRYOR , Circuit Judges, and R UIZ,* District
Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs-Appellants Moms for Liberty–Brevard County, FL
and four of its members challenged as unconstitutional the Public
Participation Policy utilized by Defendants-Appellees Brevard Pub-
lic Schools and the individual members of its school board.
* Honorable Rodolfo A. Ruiz II, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Florida, sitting by designation.
USCA11 Case: 22-10297 Date Filed: 11/21/2022 Page: 2 of 3

-- 2 of 3 --

22-10297 Opinion of the Court 3
Appellants filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which the dis-
trict court denied.
See Moms for Liberty–Brevard Cnty., FL v. Bre-
vard Pub. Schs., 582 F. Supp. 3d 1214, 1217 (M.D. Fla. 2022). Ap-
pellants timely appealed.
After review of the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of
oral argument, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s
thorough, well-reasoned order.
See Schultz v. Alabama, 42 F.4th
1298, 1311 (11th Cir. 2022) (“We review a district court’s order
granting or denying a preliminary injunction for abuse of discre-
tion.”). We therefore affirm the district court’s order denying Ap-
pellants’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-10297 Date Filed: 11/21/2022 Page: 3 of 3

-- 3 of 3 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.