USA v. Dwayne F. Maddox, Jr.

22-10772Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit08.03.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-10772
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DWAYNE F. MADDOX, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 3:19-cr-00032-CAR-CHW-3
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-10772 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 03/08/2024 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 22-10772
Before NEWSOM , BRANCH , and B LACK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Leigh Ann Webster, appointed counsel for Dwayne Mad-
dox, Jr. in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Maddox’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-10772 Document: 34-1 Date Filed: 03/08/2024 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.