Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
23-13524•In re: James. D. Esseks, et al.
23-13524Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit31.01.2024
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-13524
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
In re: JAMES D. ESSEKS,
CARL S. CHARLES,
LATISHA GOTELL FAULKS,
MELODY H. EAGAN,
JEFFREY P. DOSS, et al.,
Appellants.
____________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Alabama
USCA11 Case: 23-13524 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 01/31/2024 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2 Opinion of the Court 23-13524
D.C. Docket No. 2:22-mc-03977-WKW
____________________
Before WILSON , G RANT , and ABUDU , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants’ motions to dismiss this appeal for lack of juris-
diction are GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED. As appel-
lants recognize, the three-judge panel below has not entered a final
or appealable decision because it has reassigned the case for further
proceedings. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal,
22 F.4th 979, 986 (11th Cir. 2022) (providing that a final decision
ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to
do but execute judgment); Freyre v. Chronister, 910 F.3d 1371, 1377
(11th Cir. 2018) (noting that an order that contemplates further
substantive proceedings is not final or appealable).
USCA11 Case: 23-13524 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 01/31/2024 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.