James Clay v. Warden

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-10623
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
JAMES RASHAD CLAY,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
WARDEN,
Respondent-Appellee.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-02971-SEG
____________________
USCA11 Case: 24-10623 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 05/01/2024 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 24-10623
Before J ORDAN, R OSENBAUM , and L UCK , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. James Clay, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals from
the magistrate judge’s final report and recommendation (“R&R”)
that his habeas petition be denied. We lack jurisdiction to review
the R&R because it has not been rendered final by the district court.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061,
1066-67 (11th Cir. 1982); Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148
F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
other applicable rules.
USCA11 Case: 24-10623 Document: 13-1 Date Filed: 05/01/2024 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --