Philippe Zatta v. SCI Technology Inc, et al

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-10837
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
PHILIPPE ZOGBE ZATTA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SCI TECHNOLOGY INC,
SANMINA CORPORATION,
ALLSTATES CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
USCA11 Case: 24-10837 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 04/26/2024 Page: 1 of 3

-- 1 of 3 --

2 Opinion of the Court 24-10837
D.C. Docket No. 5:21-cv-01707-MHH
____________________
Before WILSON, J ORDAN, and NEWSOM , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic-
tion. Philippe Zatta appeals from the district court’s March 1, 2024
order denying his motion for reconsideration of the court’s April
26, 2023 order denying his motions for leave to amend the com-
plaint and “for reclassification of plaintiff as an employee for pur-
poses of litigation.” However, neither order is final or immediately
appealable.
The orders are not final decisions that ended the litigation
on the merits, as Zatta’s claims against SCI and Sanmina remand
pending. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal,
22 F.4th 979, 986 (11th Cir. 2022). Nor are the orders immediately
appealable under the collateral order doctrine because they are not
effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment resolving
this case. See Plaintiff A v. Schair, 744 F.3d 1247, 1252-53 (11th Cir.
2014) (explaining that a ruling that does not conclude the litigation
may be appealed under the collateral order doctrine if it is “effec-
tively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment”); Wells v. S.
Main Bank, 532 F.2d 1005, 1006 (5th Cir. 1976) (stating that denials
of leave to amend pleadings are not final or appealable under the
collateral order doctrine). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over
this appeal.
USCA11 Case: 24-10837 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 04/26/2024 Page: 2 of 3

-- 2 of 3 --

24-10837 Opinion of the Court 3
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies
with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all
other applicable rules.
USCA11 Case: 24-10837 Document: 14-1 Date Filed: 04/26/2024 Page: 3 of 3

-- 3 of 3 --