Mayfair Wireless LLC v. Cellco Partnership, Verizon Wireless, at&tmobility LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Sprint…

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MAYFAIR WIRELESS LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, VERIZON WIRELESS,
AT&T MOBILITY LLC, T-MOBILE USA, INC.,
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2014-1587
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 1:11-cv-00772-GMS-SRF,
Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
D ANIEL AARON K OTCHEN, Kotchen & Low LLP, Wash-
ington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represent-
ed by MICHAEL J OHN VON K LEMPERER .
J OHNATHAN S. F RANKLIN, Norton Rose Fulbright US
LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellees.
Defendant-appellee Cellco Partnership, Verizon Wireless,
also represented by G EOFFREY P. EATON, ANDREW RYAN

-- 1 of 2 --

SOMMER, CHARLES B. MOLSTER, III, ERIC M. G OLDSTEIN,
Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC. Defendant-
appellee AT&T Mobility LLC, also represented by J OSEPH
P. ZAMMIT , Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, New York, NY;
RICHARD STEPHEN ZEMBEK, D ANIEL L EVENTHAL , Norton
Rose Fulbright, Houston, TX; SHEILA K ADURA , Fulbright
& Jaworski LLP, Austin, TX. Defendant-appellee T-
Mobile USA, Inc., also represented by SHANNON J OST ,
Stokes Lawrence, P.S., Seattle WA; J OHN W. SHAW, Shaw
Keller, Wilmington, DE. Defendant-appellee Sprint
Nextel Corporation, also represented by K AREN ANN
J ACOBS , J ENNIFER Y ING, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell
LLP. Wilmington, DE.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --