Alexander Shukh v. Seagate Technology, LLC, Seagate Technology, Inc., Seagate Technology

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ALEXANDER SHUKH,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, SEAGATE
TECHNOLOGY, INC., SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY,
Defendants-Appellees
UNKNOWN OWNERS AND ASSIGNEES,
Defendant
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY PLC,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2015-1012
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota in No. 0:10-cv-00404-JRT-JJK,
Judge John R. Tunheim.
______________________
Decided: October 2, 2015
______________________
CONSTANTINE J OHN G EKAS , Gekas Law Ltd., Chicago,
IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

-- 1 of 2 --

SHUKH v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY , LLC 2
CHAD D ROWN, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneap-
olis, MN, argued for defendants-appellees. Also repre-
sented by D AVID J.F. G ROSS , CHARLES F EENEY K NAPP ,
ELIZABETH C OWAN W RIGHT , AARON D. VAN O ORT ; CALVIN
L. L ITSEY , East Palo Alto, CA.
______________________
Before M OORE, WALLACH , and T ARANTO, Circuit
Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
In light of our holding in Shukh v. Seagate Technolo-
gy, LLC, Case No. 14-1406, vacating and remanding in
part the district court’s judgment on the merits against
Alexander Shukh, we vacate and remand the district
court’s costs judgment.
VACATED AND REMANDED
COSTS
No costs.

-- 2 of 2 --